Comparative Efficacy of Transurethral Laser Ablation Versus Conventional Methods in the Management of Recurrent Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Tumours

经尿道激光消融术与传统方法治疗复发性非肌层浸润性膀胱肿瘤的疗效比较

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:  Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is characterised by a high recurrence rate, necessitating frequent intervention. While conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) under general anaesthesia is standard, it carries inherent risks. Transurethral laser ablation (TULA) performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting presents a viable, minimally invasive alternative, yet robust comparative efficacy data remain limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of TULA and TURBT in preventing early tumour recurrence and to provide practical insights for implementing an outpatient TULA service. METHODS:  This retrospective cohort study included patients with recurrent NMIBC treated with either TULA or TURBT. Patient selection for the comparative analysis was restricted to those with recurrent lesions sized less than 1 cm. The TULA procedures were performed under local anaesthesia using a holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser (Cook Medical, Ireland) and a compatible fibre. Key outcomes included the tumour recurrence rate at the first follow-up cystoscopy. Complications were assessed retrospectively over a 30-day period. RESULTS:  A total of 97 patients were included (TULA: 51; TURBT: 46). Baseline characteristics (age, sex, and risk stratification) were comparable between the groups (p>0.05). No statistically significant difference in tumour recurrence rates was observed at the first follow-up cystoscopy: 30 patients (58.8%) in the TULA group and 27 patients (58.7%) in the TURBT group exhibited no recurrence. Furthermore, TULA demonstrated no immediate post-procedure complications requiring hospital admission. Implementation of the outpatient TULA service, prioritising staff training, safety, and a robust governance framework, proved successful in our centre. CONCLUSION:  TULA performed under local anaesthesia demonstrates possible comparable efficacy to TURBT in preventing early tumour recurrence, underscoring its potential as a reasonable alternative for managing small, recurrent NMIBC, particularly for patients at higher risk of complications from general anaesthesia. Successful establishment of an outpatient TULA service, guided by clear operational and safety protocols, enhances efficiency. Larger prospective multicentre trials with longer follow-up are warranted to fully validate these findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。