Abstract
Cancer is molecularly heterogeneous, with seemingly similar patients having different molecular landscapes and accordingly different clinical behaviors. In recent studies, gene expression networks have been shown as more effective/informative for cancer heterogeneity analysis than some simpler measures. Gene interconnections can be classified as "direct" and "indirect," where the latter can be caused by shared genomic regulators (such as transcription factors, microRNAs, and other regulatory molecules) and other mechanisms. It has been suggested that incorporating the regulators of gene expressions in network analysis and focusing on the direct interconnections can lead to a deeper understanding of the more essential gene interconnections. Such analysis can be seriously challenged by the large number of parameters (jointly caused by network analysis, incorporation of regulators, and heterogeneity) and often weak signals. To effectively tackle this problem, we propose incorporating prior information contained in the published literature. A key challenge is that such prior information can be partial or even wrong. We develop a two-step procedure that can flexibly accommodate different levels of prior information quality. Simulation demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach and its superiority over relevant competitors. In the analysis of a breast cancer dataset, findings different from the alternatives are made, and the identified sample subgroups have important clinical differences.