Abstract
Brain cancer is a substantial factor in the mortality associated with cancer, presenting difficulties in the timely identification of the disease. The precision of diagnoses is significantly dependent on the proficiency of radiologists and neurologists. Although there is potential for early detection with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms, the majority of current research is hindered by its modest sample sizes. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively assess the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of computer-aided design (CAD) models specifically designed for the detection of brain cancer utilizing hyperspectral (HSI) technology. We employ Quadas-2 criteria to choose seven papers and classify the proposed methodologies according to the artificial intelligence method, cancer type, and publication year. In order to evaluate heterogeneity and diagnostic performance, we utilize Deeks' funnel plot, the forest plot, and accuracy charts. The results of our research suggest that there is no notable variation among the investigations. The CAD techniques that have been examined exhibit a notable level of precision in the automated detection of brain cancer. However, the absence of external validation hinders their potential implementation in real-time clinical settings. This highlights the necessity for additional studies in order to authenticate the CAD models for wider clinical applicability.