Abstract
BACKGROUND: HRD is a key biomarker in ovarian cancer, predicting response to PARP inhibitors. However, it remains unclear whether HRD-positive patients differ from HRD-negative patients in terms of clinical characteristics in PARP inhibitor-naïve populations. This study aims to evaluate platinum-sensitive PARP-inhibitor naïve ovarian cancer patients' clinical characteristics and survival outcomes based on HRD status. Secondly, to investigate whether platinum-resistant patients with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations are HRD-positive. METHODS: Two distinct HRD algorithms-an in-house genomic instability score (GIS) and the normalized large-scale state transitions score (nLST)-were used to stratify patients as HRD-positive or HRD-negative. Clinical data and survival in PARP inhibitor-naïve, platinum-sensitive HGSC patients were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 71 platinum-sensitive PARP-inhibitor naïve patients were analyzed. By in-house GIS, 37 patients (52%) were classified as HRD-positive and 34 (48%) as HRD-negative. Using nLST, 43 (61%) were HRD-positive and 28 (39%) were HRD-negative. Our analysis revealed no significant differences in clinical parameters or survival between HRD-positive and HRD-negative platinum-sensitive patients. The only observed difference was that somatic BRCA1/2-mutated patients were younger. In the subgroup of six platinum-resistant patients harboring HRR gene mutations, four patients (67%) were classified as HRD positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HRD status does not significantly influence clinical characteristics or survival outcomes in platinum-sensitive, PARP inhibitor-naïve HGSC patients. As some platinum-resistant patients with HRR gene mutations were HRD positive; this subgroup may benefit from further investigation into the potential effect of PARP inhibitors.