Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. As part of the brisk cross-talk between the host and the tumor, prognosis can be affected through inflammatory responses or the tumor microenvironment. However, further exploration of the inflammatory response-related genes that have prognostic value, microenvironment infiltration, and chemotherapeutic therapies in CC is needed. Methods: The clinical data and mRNA expression profiles of CC patients were downloaded from a public database for this study. In the TCGA cohort, a multigene prognostic signature was constructed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox analyses. CC patients from the GEO cohort were used for validation. K‒M analysis was used to compare overall survival (OS) between the high- and low-risk groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were applied to determine the independent predictors of OS. The immune cell infiltration and immune-related functional score were calculated by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Immunohistochemistry was utilized to validate the protein expression of prognostic genes in CC tissues. Results: A genetic signature model associated with the inflammatory response was built by LASSO Cox regression analysis. Patients in the high-risk group had a significantly lower OS rate. The predictive ability of the prognostic genes was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The risk score was confirmed to be an independent predictor of OS by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. The immune status differed between the high-risk and low-risk groups, and the cancer-related pathways were enriched in the high-risk group according to functional analysis. The risk score was significantly related to tumor stage and immune infiltration type. The expression levels of five prognostic genes (LCK, GCH1, TNFRSF9, ITGA5, and SLC7A1) were positively related to sensitivity to antitumor drugs. Additionally, the expression of prognostic genes was significantly different between CC tissues and myoma patient cervix (non-tumorous) tissues in the separate sample cohort. Conclusion: A model consisting of 5 inflammation-related genes can be used to predict prognosis and influence immune status in CC patients. Furthermore, the inhibition or enhancement of these genes may become a novel alternative therapy.