Comparative effects of weight-loss diet, exercise training, respiratory muscle training, and oropharyngeal muscle training in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

减肥饮食、运动训练、呼吸肌训练和口咽肌训练对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的比较效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder and has become a significant public health issue. Weight-loss diet (WLD), exercise training (ET), respiratory muscle training (RMT), and oropharyngeal muscle training (OMT) have been shown to improve OSA symptoms to some extent, offering new treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative efficacy of WLD, ET, RMT, and OMT in patients with OSA through a systematic review and network meta-analysis, and to provide evidence-based support for clinical decision-making on lifestyle and functional training interventions in OSA management. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to December 2025, with an updated search performed in January 2026. The primary outcome was the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), while secondary outcomes included the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and body mass index (BMI). Risk of bias was assessed using RevMan 5.4, and the GRADE method was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for all outcomes. Network meta-analysis was conducted using the "network" command in STATA 17.0. RESULTS: ET exhibited the most significant efficacy in reducing the AHI (MD = -9.13, 95% CI: -12.04 to -6.21, SUCRA = 89.9%) and the PSQI (MD = -2.20, 95% CI: -3.23 to -1.16, SUCRA = 78.1%); OMT yielded the greatest reduction in the ESS score (MD = -4.00, 95% CI: -5.45 to -2.56, SUCRA = 92.2%); WLD showed the most prominent effect in reducing the BMI (MD = -2.39, 95% CI: -3.95 to -0.84, SUCRA = 96.2%). CONCLUSION: Lifestyle and functional training interventions demonstrate distinct outcome-specific effects in the management of OSA. These findings suggest that individualized intervention strategies should be selected in clinical practice based on patients' predominant symptoms and therapeutic goals. However, the effects of these interventions still require further high-quality evidence to be fully validated.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。