Guideline-concordant inhaled medication use in COPD: a systematic review of definitions used in administrative health data

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入药物使用指南一致性:行政健康数据中使用的定义的系统评价

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessments of guideline-discordant use of maintenance inhaled therapies for COPD in administrative health data are common but restricted by lack of patient characteristics. We systematically reviewed definitions of guideline-concordant and guideline-discordant maintenance inhaled medication use applied to administrative health data. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from January 2000 to September 2024 for studies that 1) used administrative health data to identify adults with COPD who were prescribed long-acting bronchodilators (LABDs) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for outpatient treatment; 2) defined maintenance inhaled medication use as guideline-concordant and/or guideline-discordant at the patient level. We developed standardised definitions for claims data aligned with management recommendations and conducted a meta-analysis to assess the proportion of patients with guideline-concordant and guideline-discordant medication use. RESULTS: We screened 4578 records and included 20 studies. There were 22 unique definitions of guideline-concordance or discordance, based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations. The most common measurements were 1) guideline-discordant ICS use (n=10); 2) guideline-concordant LABDs use (n=8); and 3) guideline-concordant ICS use, focusing on ICS alone (n=4) regardless of LABDs or with LABDs (n=6). Given that acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) was the most commonly used criterion and aligned with recommendations, we developed an AECOPD risk-based definition. Pooled analysis showed 50% guideline-concordant LABDs use and 45% guideline-discordant ICS use across populations. CONCLUSIONS: Definitions of guideline-concordant LABDs use and guideline-discordant ICS use in administrative health data are largely congruent with GOLD. AECOPD risk-based definitions provide a generalisable approach for assessing guideline-concordance in administrative data.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。