Optimizing endoscopic detection of early gastric cancer: stratification and preventive strategies for Peri-ESD diagnostic oversights

优化内镜下早期胃癌的检测:围手术期ESD诊断疏漏的分层和预防策略

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peri-endoscopic submucosal dissection missed early gastric cancers (peri-ESD MEGCs), defined as ESD-indicated lesions overlooked during pre-ESD diagnostic workup or post-ESD surveillance, may arise from deficiencies at any procedural phase (preparation, observation, diagnosis, or sampling). To address this, we developed a temporal-procedural bidirectional assessment protocol specifically targeting peri-ESD MEGCs, aiming to optimize endoscopic quality and prevent diagnostic omissions. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 1,011 EGC lesions treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between 2017 and 2024 were analyzed. The primary analysis defined the MEGC time window as 24 months. Peri-ESD MEGCs were stratified into two temporal phases, pre-ESD examination vs. post-ESD surveillance, and four etiological categories, inadequate preparation, inadequate observation, diagnosis error, and sampling error, for each endoscopic cause of MEGC. To assess the robustness of our findings, a sensitivity analysis was performed by redefining the MEGC time window as 12 months. RESULTS: Among 94 peri-ESD MEGCs, pre-ESD MEGCs (n=52) predominantly demonstrated inadequate observation (51.9%), which was associated with greater curvature location (OR: 5.45; 95% CI: 1.76-16.91), nonuse of near-focus narrow-band imaging (NF-NBI, OR: 16.78; 95% CI: 5.50-51.26), and severe intestinal metaplasia (OR: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.09-13.52). Post-ESD MEGCs (n=42) predominantly demonstrated a diagnosis error (52.4%), correlated with trainees (OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.06-11.68), small lesions (<15 mm, OR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.10-13.36), nonuse of NF-NBI (OR: 17.44; 95% CI: 4.81-63.17), and severe atrophic gastritis (OR: 7.78; 95% CI: 1.91-31.20). The sensitivity analysis using a 12-month MEGC time window yielded results consistent with the primary analysis, demonstrating the robustness of the identified risk factors for peri-ESD missed lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing peri-ESD gastroscopic observation (via NF-NBI) and post-ESD diagnostic accuracy (through operator training) could significantly reduce peri-ESD MEGCs, particularly those reflecting characteristics of ESD-eligible lesions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。