Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the potential causal roles of specific circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) and immune cell subsets in the pathogenesis of hypertrophic scars and keloids using a 2-step Mendelian randomization framework. We employed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization approach to evaluate the causal relationships between miRNAs, immune cell genotypes, and scar phenotypes. The analysis integrated miRNA expression quantitative trait loci, immune cell genome-wide association studies, and scar datasets. A 2-step mediation analysis was conducted to assess the indirect effects of miRNAs on scars through immune cell genotypes, using inverse variance weighted methods and complementary sensitivity analyses to ensure robustness. Our analysis identified significant associations between specific miRNAs and scar phenotypes. Notably, miR-6887-5p exhibited a total effect on keloid formation risk (β = 0.324, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.073-0.576) and a direct effect (β = 0.283, 95% CI: 0.027, 0.538), with a marginally significant mediation effect through B-cell activating factor receptor on CD20- CD38- B cells (β = 0.042, 95% CI: -0.001, 0.084, P = .047). For hypertrophic scars, miR-345-5p demonstrated a significant total effect (β = -0.501, 95% CI: -0.903, -0.099) and direct effect (β = -0.469, 95% CI: -0.872, -0.066), with a significant mediation effect through CD28+ CD45RA- CD8dim T cell percentage (β = -0.032, 95% CI: -0.062, -0.002, P = .034). miR-4801 showed a significant total effect (β = -0.246, 95% CI: -0.429, -0.064) and direct effect (β = -0.218, 95% CI: -0.402, -0.033), with a marginally significant mediation effect through T cell absolute count (β = -0.028, 95% CI: -0.057, -0.000, P = .043). These findings highlight the interplay between miRNAs and immune cell subsets in scar pathogenesis. This study provides preliminary evidence for the causal roles of specific miRNAs and immune cell subsets in scar formation, emphasizing the potential of miRNA-immune cell axes as therapeutic targets. While the identified associations offer important insights into the molecular mechanisms of scar heterogeneity, further validation through mechanistic studies and clinical trials is necessary to translate these genetic insights into clinical interventions.