Perioperative outcomes and survival of indocyanine green-guided minimally esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective comparison study

吲哚菁绿引导下微创食管切除术治疗食管癌患者的围手术期结局和生存率:一项回顾性比较研究

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A growing body of clinical research has highlighted the potential of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for precise lymph node (LN) identification and dissection in esophageal cancer (EC). However, several issues remain. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of indocyanine green (ICG)-guided LN dissection during radical esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), while also assessing its long-term outcomes. Our findings provide a theoretical foundation for future research in this field. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with ESCC who underwent surgical resection at a single center between November 2019 and November 2021. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Data, including baseline patient characteristics, postoperative complications, quality of life scores, and survival outcomes, were collected through a comprehensive review of the clinical record system and patient-administered surveys. RESULTS: The two groups were well-balanced in terms of the baseline characteristics [all P>0.05, except American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, P=0.023]. Compared with the non-ICG group, the ICG group had significantly higher mean numbers of pathologically dissected LNs (15.1±1.6 vs. 12.5±3.0, P<0.001) and small mediastinal lymph nodes (smLNs) (6.2±1.8 vs. 3.1±1.2, P<0.001). The number of metastatic smLNs was also significantly higher in the ICG group than the non-ICG group (2.3±1.1 vs. 1.2±0.8, P<0.05), while the number of LN stations dissected was comparable between the two groups (P=0.995). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic fistula: 10.0% vs. 6.9%, P=0.559; chylothorax: 6.7% vs. 14.7%, P=0.121) and operative metrics (total operative time: 245.3±32.6 vs. 238.5±29.4 min, P=0.215; intraoperative blood loss: 125.6±35.2 vs. 132.3±38.7 mL, P=0.324). In the survival analysis, the ICG group had significantly better DFS (median follow-up: 30.1 vs. 28.7 months) and OS (median follow-up: 32.7 vs. 29.9 months) than the non-ICG group. The non-ICG group had higher event rates for DFS (64.7% vs. 41.7%) and OS (38.8% vs. 28.3%), with multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 3.38 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.99-5.74, P<0.001] for DFS and 2.86 (95% CI: 1.51-5.43, P<0.001) for OS. Additionally, the ICG group had a significantly lower locoregional recurrence rate than the non-ICG group (48.0% vs. 65.3%, P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: ICG-guided LN dissection during minimally invasive EC surgery may contribute to improved DFS and OS in patients with ESCC.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。