Assessment of proprioceptive decline in chronic ankle instability: a comparative evaluation of sub-modalities

慢性踝关节不稳患者本体感觉下降的评估:子模式的比较评价

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recurrent ankle sprains in chronic ankle instability (CAI) individuals are strongly linked to impaired proprioception, but the specific mechanisms underlying these impairments remain incompletely understood. This is largely due to the complexity of the proprioceptive system, which comprises multiple sub-modalities such as kinesthesia, joint position sense, force sense, vibration sense and landing proprioception, with the characteristic deficits of these sub-modalities and their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity remaining unclear. This study aims to comprehensively assess proprioception in CAI individuals by pointing sub-modality deficits, and to identify the core sub-modality with the greatest clinical discriminative value for CAI. METHODS: Fifty-eight participants were recruited, including 29 with CAI and 29 healthy controls. They underwent a battery of proprioceptive assessments: kinesthesia via the Threshold to Detect Passive Movement (TTDPM) test, joint position sense through the Joint Position Reproduction (JPR) test, force sense with the Force Match (FM) test, vibration sense using the Vibration Detection Threshold test, and landing proprioception evaluated by the Ankle Inversion Discrimination Apparatus for Landing (AIDAL) test. Between-group differences were analyzed using independent samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and AUC tests. RESULT: Higher passive perception thresholds in TTDPM tests (dorsiflexion: p = 0.03; inversion: p = 0.004; eversion: p = 0.018), higher absolute errors in FM tests (plantarflexion: p = 0.025; dorsiflexion: p = 0.043; inversion: p = 0.018; eversion: p = 0.014) and lower AIDAL score (p = 0.002) were detected in people with CAI. ROC curve analysis of the tests with significant intergroup differences revealed that the AIDAL exhibited the highest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.728). CONCLUSION: Proprioceptive deficits in CAI are modality-specific, primarily affecting kinesthesia, force sense, and landing proprioception. Among the impaired sub-modalities, landing proprioception has the strongest predictive value for CAI and can serve as a key target for clinical assessment and rehabilitation intervention.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。