Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology is rapidly advancing in psychiatry. Informed consent competency (ICC) assessment among psychiatric patients is a pivotal concern in clinical research. AIM: To analyze the assessment of ICC and form a framework with multi-dimensional elements involved in ICC of BCI clinical research among psychiatric disorders. METHODS: A systematic review of studies regarding ICC assessments of BCI clinical research in patients with six kinds of psychiatric disorders was conducted. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Peer-reviewed articles and full-text studies were included in the analysis. There were no date restrictions, and all studies published up to February 27, 2025, were included. RESULTS: A total of 103 studies were selected for this review. Fifty-eight studies included ICC factors, and forty-five were classified in ICC related ethical issues of BCI research in six kinds of psychiatric disorders. Executive function impairment is widely recognized as the most significant factor impacting ICC, and processing speed deficits are observed in schizophrenia, mood disorders, and Alzheimer's disease. Memory dysfunction, particularly episodic and working memory, contributes to compromised ICC. Five core ethical issues in BCI research should be addressed: BCI specificity, vulnerability, autonomy, dynamic ICC, comprehensiveness, and uncertainty. CONCLUSION: A Five-Dimensional evaluative framework, including clinical, ethical, sociocultural, legal, and procedural dimensions, is constructed and proposed for future ICC research in BCI clinical research involving psychiatric disorders.