Abstract
Turn-taking is a central feature of conversation across languages and cultures.(1)(,)(2)(,)(3)(,)(4) This key social behavior requires numerous sensorimotor and cognitive operations(1)(,)(5)(,)(6) that can be organized into three general phases: comprehension of a partner's turn, preparation of a speaker's own turn, and execution of that turn. Using intracranial electrocorticography, we recently demonstrated that neural activity related to these phases is functionally distinct during turn-taking.(7) In particular, networks active during the perceptual and articulatory stages of turn-taking consisted of structures known to be important for speech-related sensory and motor processing,(8)(,)(9)(,)(10)(,)(11)(,)(12)(,)(13)(,)(14)(,)(15)(,)(16)(,)(17) while putative planning dynamics were most regularly observed in the caudal inferior frontal gyrus (cIFG) and the middle frontal gyrus (cMFG). To test if these structures are necessary for planning during spoken interaction, we used direct electrical stimulation (DES) to transiently perturb cortical function in neurosurgical patient-volunteers performing a question-answer task.(7)(,)(18)(,)(19) We found that stimulating the cIFG and cMFG led to various response errors(9)(,)(13)(,)(20)(,)(21) but not gross articulatory deficits, which instead resulted from DES of structures involved in motor control(8)(,)(13)(,)(20)(,)(22) (e.g., the precentral gyrus). Furthermore, perturbation of the cIFG and cMFG delayed inter-speaker timing-consistent with slowed planning-while faster responses could result from stimulation of sites located in other areas. Taken together, our findings suggest that the cIFG and cMFG contain critical preparatory circuits that are relevant for interactive language use.