Construct strength of a drilling trajectory angled proximally avoiding the posterior interosseous nerve in single incision distal biceps repair; a comparative cadaveric study

单切口远端肱二头肌修复术中,采用近端倾斜钻孔轨迹避开骨间后神经,以构建其强度:一项尸体解剖比较研究

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distal biceps tendon repair using a bicortical button is a biomechanically robust technique but carries a risk of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury, particularly with traditional drilling trajectories. Cadaveric studies have suggested that angling the drill trajectory both ulnarly and proximally may increase the distance to the PIN and reduce this risk. However, the biomechanical construct strength of such modified trajectories remains unestablished. METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen human upper limbs were randomly assigned to either a control group (20° ulnar and perpendicular) or an intervention group (20° ulnar and 30° proximal). Standardized bicortical button repairs were performed following simulated distal biceps ruptures. All specimens underwent cyclic loading (1,000 cycles, 5-100 N, 2.5 Hz), followed by load-to-failure testing. Primary outcome was maximum load to failure. Secondary outcomes included construct stiffness, displacement, and mode of failure. RESULTS: Two failures occurred during cyclic loading, both in the control group (P = .164). There were no significant differences in load to failure (control: median 247.2 N [range: 210.1-310.9]; intervention: 284.0 N [149.5-308.5]; P = .345), stiffness (control: 56.2 N/mm; intervention: 53.3 N/mm; P = .852), or displacement during cyclic loading or at failure (P > .3). Failure modes included suture rupture, tendon-suture interface failure, and bone fracture; all were classified as type 1 failures. No statistically significant differences in failure mode were observed between groups, although bone-related failure occurred only in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A proximally angled (30°) and ulnar (20°) drilling trajectory for distal biceps repair using a bicortical button yields construct strength comparable to the traditional perpendicular axial ulnar trajectory. This technique may reduce the risk of PIN injury without compromising mechanical integrity. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm safety and efficacy in vivo.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。