Effect of Linear Sprints and Change-of-Direction Training Versus Small-Sided Soccer Games on Physical Performance in Highly Trained Young Female Soccer Players: A Randomized Cross-Over Study

直线冲刺和变向训练与小场地足球比赛对高水平年轻女足球员体能表现的影响:一项随机交叉研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effects of linear sprint training with changes of direction (LSCD) versus small-sided games (SSSG) on physical performance, agility, and soccer-specific skills in young elite female players. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, 27 players aged 15 to 17 were divided into two groups (G1 = 14, G2 = 13). After a two-week baseline period, each group completed a four-week training mesocycle (three sessions per week) consisting of either LSCD or SSG. After a two-week washout period, participants switched interventions and completed the alternate four-week mesocycle. Performance assessments were conducted before and after each mesocycle to evaluate training effects. RESULTS: Both types of training improved physical performance, with different magnitudes. LSCD induced larger gains in sprint speed (5, 10, 20 m; p < 0.05), agility without the ball (t-test; p = 0.05), and explosive power (countermovement jump, repeated jumps over 15 s; p = 0.02 and p = 0.004). In contrast, SSSG led to larger improvements in aerobic endurance (Yo-Yo IR1 test; p = 0.03) and agility with the ball (t-test with ball; p = 0.05). No transfer effect between cycles was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In young elite female players, LSCD training was more effective in improving speed, agility, and power, while SSSG was more effective for aerobic endurance and ball agility.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。