Can musculoskeletal ultrasound identify the pediatric discoid lateral meniscus and determine subtypes with promising diagnostic efficiency?

肌肉骨骼超声能否识别儿童盘状外侧半月板并确定其亚型,且具有良好的诊断效能?

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent studies, there have been no reports on the diagnostic value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in pediatric patients with a discoid lateral meniscus (DLM). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in pediatric DLM patients and to investigate potential correlations between ultrasound indices and subgroup classifications on the basis of ultrasound findings. METHODS: This study included patients aged 18 years or younger from 1 September 2021, to 1 January 2023, who were diagnosed with lateral meniscus (LM) or DLM injuries through arthroscopic surgery. Ultrasound and MRI assessments were performed before surgery. Radiological measurements were conducted by one evaluator to determine the diagnostic value of the two methods. The McNemar-Bowker test was used to compare the sensitivity and specificity between the two methods. Spearman's correlation was used for correlation analysis of different injury types. Cluster analysis was used to explore the basis for classifying the DLM. RESULTS: This study included 72 patients (37 females and 35 males). The average age was 11.18 ± 4.25 years, and the BMI was 18.50 ± 3.46 kg/m 2 . The results revealed the high diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound and MRI. There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity in diagnosing DLM via ultrasound compared with MRI ( P >0.05). Subgroup analysis did not reveal a significant difference between complete/incomplete DLM type or child/adolescent age ( P >0.05). Correlation analysis revealed that DLM patients were more likely to suffer from vertical tears (r = 0.34, P = 0.015) and locking symptoms (r = 0.36, P = 0.032). In the 30-degree flexion assessment, body thickness was useful for detecting vertical (r = 0.26, P = 0.049) and bucket tears (r = 0.3, P = 0.026). Cluster analysis of all DLM patients revealed two subtypes: DLM type I, with more anterior horn tears, and Type II DLM, with more popliteal hiatus tears ( P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: MUS has proven to be a valuable diagnostic tool with comparable diagnostic efficiency to that of MRI in pediatric DLM. Ultrasound indices correlated with different injury types and related symptoms. Cluster analysis revealed that pediatric DLMs can potentially be classified into two types. The two types of injuries differ in terms of injury area.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。