Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation combined with inspiratory muscle training on lung function and exercise capacity in older patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

肺康复联合吸气肌训练对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能和运动能力的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is central to COPD management, with inspiratory muscle training (IMT) as a key component. However, evidence is inconsistent on whether combining PR with IMT offers added benefits for older COPD patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative effects of PR combined with IMT versus PR alone on key outcomes in older COPD patients, including quality of life [St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)], exercise tolerance [6-min walk distance (6MWD)], respiratory muscle strength [maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax)], and pulmonary function metrics (FEV(1), FEV(1)%). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (January 2005-January 2025) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting criteria: (1) participants were ≥ 55 years old with GOLD stage II-IV COPD; (2) interventions compared PR combined with IMT versus PR alone; (3) outcomes included PImax, FEV(1), FEV(1)%, SGRQ, and 6MWD. Non-English and animal studies were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated via the GRADEpro 3.6.1. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (582 patients) were included. Compared with PR alone, PR combined with IMT did not improve 6MWD (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI: -0.11-0.42; low-quality evidence) or SGRQ scores (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.38-0.01, low-quality evidence). PImax improved moderately (SMD = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.44-1.13, I(2) = 48.7%, low-quality evidence). FEV(1) and FEV(1)% trended upward (SMD = 0.50 and 0.58, respectively) but showed high heterogeneity (FEV(1): I(2) = 72.9%, p = 0.025, very low-quality evidence; FEV(1)%: I(2) = 75.6%, p = 0.006, low-quality evidence), precluding significance. Subgroup analyses showed significant PImax improvements in interventions lasting ≥ 12 weeks (SMD = 0.866, 95% CI: 0.579-1.153; I(2) = 0%) or with weekly cumulative durations ≥ 180 min (SMD = 0.922, 95% CI: 0.666-1.177; I(2) = 0%), with no 6MWD benefits in any subgroup. CONCLUSION: Low-quality evidence indicates that PR combined with IMT improves respiratory muscle strength (PImax) in older COPD patients versus PR alone, with no significant benefit for exercise capacity (6MWD) or lung function. For older COPD patients, ≥ 12-week PR combined with IMT interventions (sessions > 60 min; weekly duration ≥ 180 min) may enhance PImax. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251010168, CRD420251010168.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。