Emergency Department and COVID-19 Pandemic Stress Test: A Comparison between Two European Settings

急诊科与新冠肺炎疫情压力测试:两种欧洲模式的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the changes in the emergency department (ED) activity of two hospitals during the 2020 lockdown and corresponding timeframes in 2019 and 2021 to assess whether a more structured primary healthcare service could have influenced the COVID-19 pressure on the ED. SUBJECT AND METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study on adult subjects registered to the selected ED during the timeframes considered. Patients <16 years old and women with obstetric or gynecological complaints were excluded. Study period was from 9 March to 3 May for the Italian ED (55 days) and March 14 to May 10 for the Spanish ED (57 days) in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Primary outcome includes difference in the number of ED admissions. Secondary outcomes consist of differences in hospital admission rates, priority code at triage, and disease group. RESULTS: Overall, a greater number of patients flowed through the Spanish ED (14,034 vs. 8,569 in 2019, 7,208 vs. 3,101 in 2020, and 13,214 vs. 5,555 in 2021), with smaller proportional declines and lower admission rates (13% vs. 16.9% in 2019, 19.6% vs. 34.3% in 2020, and 14.3% vs. 26.3% in 2021) observed. Most referrals were for nonemergency conditions, followed by trauma and intoxications. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the Italian setting, the Spanish ED showed increased activity alongside lower hospitalization rates. Further investigation is required to evaluate the potential role of more structured primary healthcare assistance in enhancing the discharge rate to homecare or primary healthcare facilities during the specified timeframes.

.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。