Abstract
Admixture mapping studies have become more common in recent years, due in part to technological advances and growing international efforts to increase the diversity of genetic studies. However, many open questions remain about appropriate implementation of admixture mapping studies, including how best to control for multiple testing, particularly in the presence of population structure. In this study, we develop a theoretical framework to characterize the correlation of local ancestry and admixture mapping test statistics in admixed populations with contributions from any number of ancestral populations and arbitrary population structure. Based on this framework, we develop an analytical approach for obtaining genome-wide significance thresholds for admixture mapping studies. We validate our approach via analysis of simulated traits with real genotype data for 8,064 unrelated African American and 3,425 Hispanic/Latina women from the Women's Health Initiative SNP Health Association Resource (WHI SHARe). In an application to these WHI SHARe data, our approach yields genome-wide significant p value thresholds of 2.1 × 10(-5) and 4.5 × 10(-6) for admixture mapping studies in the African American and Hispanic/Latina cohorts, respectively. Compared to other commonly used multiple testing correction procedures, our method is fast, easy to implement (using our publicly available R package), and controls the family-wise error rate even in structured populations. Importantly, we note that the appropriate admixture mapping significance threshold depends on the number of ancestral populations, generations since admixture, and population structure of the sample; as a result, significance thresholds are not, in general, transferable across studies.