Abstract
Background/Objectives: This ex vivo study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultra-low-dose (ULD) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols in detecting vestibular bone defects for immediate implant planning, using intraoral scan (IOS) data as a reference. Methods: Four CBCT protocols (ENDO, A, B, C) were applied to four dried human skulls using a standardized setup and a single CBCT unit (Planmeca ProMax(®) 3D Mid, Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland). All scans were taken at 90 kV, with varying parameters: (1) ENDO (40 × 50 mm, 75 µm, 12 mA, 80-120 µSv, 15 s), (2) A (50 × 50 mm, 75 µm, 9 mA, 20-40 µSv, 5 s), (3) B (100 × 60 mm, 150 µm, 7.1 mA, 22-32 µSv, 5 s), and (4) C (100 × 100 mm, 200 µm, 7.1 mA, 44 µSv, 4 s). Vestibular root surfaces of single-rooted teeth (FDI regions 15-25 and 35-45) were digitized via IOS and exported as STL files. CBCT datasets were superimposed using 3D software (Blender 2.79), and surface defects were measured and compared using one-sample t-tests and Bland-Altman analysis. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 330 vestibular surfaces from 66 teeth were analyzed. Compared to the IOS reference, protocols ENDO and A showed minimal differences (p > 0.05). In contrast, protocols B and C exhibited statistically significant deviations (p < 0.05). Protocol B demonstrated a mean difference of -0.477 mm(2) with limits of agreement (LoA) from -2.04 to 1.09 mm(2) and significant intra-rater variability (p < 0.05). Protocol C revealed a similar mean deviation (-0.455 mm(2)) but a wider LoA (-2.72 to 1.81 mm(2)), indicating greater measurement variability. Overall, larger voxel sizes were associated with increased random error, although deviations remained within clinically acceptable limits. Conclusions: Despite statistical significance, deviations for protocols B and C remained within clinically acceptable limits. ULD CBCT protocols are, thus, suitable for evaluating vestibular bone defects with reduced radiation exposure.