Abstract
Background: Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major global health concern, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Cirrhosis and liver cancer are the leading causes of liver-related deaths, with various etiological factors, such as metabolic disorders and alcohol-related and viral hepatitis, driving its global prevalence. Non-invasive biomarkers and scoring systems have emerged as key tools for assessing liver disease severity and differentiating CLD from cirrhosis. This study evaluates biomarkers and non-invasive scores and their utility in distinguishing CLD from cirrhosis. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 250 adult patients hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2023 at Cluj County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania. Patients were diagnosed with either cirrhosis or CLD of viral, autoimmune, or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) etiology. Non-invasive biomarkers, scores, and various hemogram-derived ratios were evaluated. Statistical analysis involved descriptive statistics, comparative tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Among the 250 patients, 137 had liver cirrhosis (54.8%) and 113 had CLD without cirrhosis (45.2%). Significant differences were observed in laboratory parameters, with cirrhosis patients showing lower hemoglobin, platelet count, and albumin levels alongside higher liver enzymes and INR values. Non-invasive scores such as APRI, FIB-4, and NFS demonstrated higher values in the cirrhosis group, indicating more advanced liver damage. Hemogram-derived ratios, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), were higher in cirrhosis patients. ROC analysis revealed that the Lok index had the highest discriminatory power (AUC 0.89), followed by the King score (AUC 0.864) and the Fibrosis index (AUC 0.856), which effectively distinguished cirrhosis from CLD. Conclusions: This study underscores the utility of non-invasive biomarkers and scoring systems in differentiating CLD from cirrhosis. The Lok index, King score, and Fibrosis index demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy, while hemogram-derived ratios, such as NLR, offer insights into systemic inflammation associated with liver disease progression. These findings support the integration of non-invasive markers into clinical practice for improved risk stratification and management of liver diseases.