Efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam versus other antimicrobial agents for treating multidrug- resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a propensity-matched retrospective analysis

头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与其他抗菌药物治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌的疗效比较:一项倾向性匹配回顾性分析

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) is a life-threatening infection with limited treatment options. As a novel combination drug of cephalosporin and beta-lactamase inhibitor, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) is not much used in clinical treatment of MDRPA infections. To fill in this knowledge gap, a single-center real-world study was conducted. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included MDRPA-infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI or other antimicrobial agents between January 2019 and April 2021. Propensity score-matched and binary logistic regression analysis was used to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy between CAZ/AVI and other antimicrobial agents. RESULTS: Totally 363 patients with MDRPA infection were enrolled, including 49 patients treated with CAZ/AVI and 314 patients treated with other antimicrobial agents. The CAZ/AVI group exhibited a reduced failure rate of clinical treatment (P = 0.012, OR = 0.381, 95% CI 0.180 - 0.807). Subgroup analysis showed single lung infection was a significant risk factor for clinical treatment failure in patients treated with other antimicrobial agents (P = 0.023, OR = 2.568, 95% CI 1.138 - 5.796). No significant discrepancy was observed in microbiological efficacy between the two groups (P = 0.159, OR = 0.587, 95% CI 0.280 - 1.232), or in clinical and microbiological efficacy between CAZ/AVI monotherapy and combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ/AVI demonstrates superior clinical efficacy against MDRPA in comparison to other antimicrobial agents. However, the administration of CAZ/AVI as part of combination therapy does not provide any clear benefits over monotherapy. Patients with single pulmonary infection caused by MDRPA show better clinical efficacy with CAZ/AVI. Further larger studies are needed to substantiate our findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。