Comparative Outcomes Between Classic and Silent ICU Models During COVID-19 Surge in Taiwan: A Real-World Cohort Analysis from a Dual-Campus Medical Center

台湾新冠疫情高峰期间经典ICU模式与无声ICU模式的疗效比较:来自双院区医疗中心的真实世界队列分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: During Taiwan's May 2021 COVID-19 surge, hospitals expanded ICU capacity using both conventional and ward-converted ("silent") ICUs. Methods: We retrospectively compared adults with severe COVID-19 admitted to three ICUs (two classic and one ward-based) between May and August 2021. The primary outcome was ICU mortality; secondary outcomes included ventilator-weaning success and complications. Results: Sixty-four patients were included (28 classic, 36 silent ICU). Baseline severity was comparable (median APACHE II 21 vs. 20). ICU mortality was 29% vs. 36% (risk difference 7.5%, 95% CI -18.6 to 33.1). No difference was found in weaning success or complication rates. No staff infections occurred. Conclusions: Outcomes in the ward-converted silent ICU were comparable to those in classic ICUs. With appropriate infection control and staffing, silent ICUs can safely expand surge capacity.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。