Comprehensive evaluation of oculus pentacam in subclinical keratoconus and clinical keratoconus patients at different stages

对不同阶段的亚临床圆锥角膜和临床圆锥角膜患者进行 Oculus Pentacam 的全面评估

阅读:3

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and identify the ability of the Oculus Pentacam parameters to distinguish subclinical keratoconus (SCKC) and clinical keratoconus (CKC) at different stages in normal eyes. METHODS: SCKC (n = 28), KC Stage I (n = 25), KC Stage II (n = 40), KC Stage III (n = 35), KC Stage IV (n = 26), and normal eyes (n = 46) were analyzed using the Oculus Pentacam HR. Comparisons between groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise comparison Dunn tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the predictive accuracy of each parameter, as described by the area under the curve (AUC). The AUCs were compared using the DeLong method. RESULTS: The SCKC group demonstrated a notable decrease in corneal thickness compared with the normal group. Index Surface Variance (ISV) had the highest ability to distinguish SCKC from normal (AUC: 0.897, sensitivity: 78.57%, specificity: 95.74%), followed by Ambrósio-Relational Thickness (ARTmax). ISV and index vertical asymmetry showed perfect discrimination ability to distinguish KC Stage I from normal eyes. Most of the Pentacam parameters had sufficient strength to differentiate between Stage II and normal eyes. CONCLUSION: The ISV from Pentacam was the most sensitive parameter for detecting SCKC, Stage I KC, and Stage II KC. Pentacam indices related to corneal thickness may be particularly valuable for identifying early signs of corneal ectasia when no abnormalities in topography are observed.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。