Using multimodal PET+MR data as conditional generative adversarial network inputs improves pseudo-CT and attenuation correction estimates for brain PET/MR

使用多模态PET+MR数据作为条件生成对抗网络输入,可以改善脑部PET/MR的伪CT和衰减校正估计。

阅读:2

Abstract

To obtain qualitatively and quantitatively accurate positron emission tomography (PET) images, the recorded PET emission data must be corrected for photon attenuation. Attenuation correction (AC) factors are typically estimated from X-ray computed tomography (CT) data acquired during an integrated PET/CT study. Estimating these factors from magnetic resonance (MR) data in an integrated PET/MR scanner is challenging, as MR images don't provide direct information about annihilation photon attenuation. Conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) have shown promising results for both emission-based and MR-based AC. This study explored whether combining these approaches could further improve brain PET AC accuracy. Thirty-five patients who received same-day whole-body PET/MR and PET/CT scans participated in this study. The non-attenuation-corrected and non-scatter-corrected (NASC) PET, MR, and CT reconstructed head regions were cropped and automatically co-registered. Four networks were trained to translate NASC PET and MR images into pseudo-CTs. Three used single-modality input, and the fourth used multi-modality. The multi-modality cGAN produced significantly better pseudo-CTs vs. the single-modality cGANs, with an average structural similarity index (SSIM) and dice similarity coefficients for bone, soft-tissue, and air of 0.865±0.001, 0.715±0.002, 0.915±0.001, and 0.567±0.004, respectively, vs. 0.841±0.001, 0.660±0.003, 0.894±0.001, and 0.524±0.005, for the single-modality cGANs with the best results. When comparing the AC PET reconstructed images, all cGANs outperformed the clinical atlas-based method used in commercially available PET/MR systems, and, as expected, the multi-modal cGAN achieved the highest quality results with average SSIM, and peak signal-to-noise ratio of 0.9987±0.0001, and 50.0±0.4, respectively, vs. 0.9913±0.0024, and 44.3±0.3 for the atlas method.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。