Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive therapies for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

微创疗法治疗足底筋膜炎的比较疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

阅读:3

Abstract

Plantar fasciitis is a common and often disabling condition that affects both general and athletic populations, with chronic cases significantly impairing function and quality of life. Although a wide range of conservative and non-invasive, and minimally invasive treatments are available, the absence of direct comparative evidence has limited clarity about which interventions offer the most durable benefits. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 63 randomized controlled trials including 4170 participants to evaluate extracorporeal shock wave therapy, prolotherapy, and injection-based therapies including platelet-rich plasma, botulinum toxin A, corticosteroids, autologous blood, and local anaesthetics. Across short-, mid-, and long-term follow- up, botulinum toxin A provided the greatest short-term improvements in pain and plantar fascia thickness, where prolotherapy was most effective for sustained pain relief. Corticosteroids injection yielded the largest short-term function gains, while platelet-rich plasma supported the long-term improvements in both function and plantar fascia thickness. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy demonstrated broad efficacy across all domains and timepoints. These findings provide updated comparative evidence to guide clinical decision-making, suggesting that treatment strategies for plantar fasciitis should be tailored to symptom duration and therapeutic goals rather than defaulting to one intervention alone. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420250641285.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。