Evolocumab Added to Statin Is Associated With Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaque Regression Compared With Statin Alone

与单独使用他汀类药物相比,依洛尤单抗联合他汀类药物可促进颅内动脉粥样硬化斑块消退。

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitor for intensive lipid-lowering, on intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. METHODS: From a prospectively established high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging database, consecutive patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (≥50%) with 2 detections of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging over 6 months were included in this retrospective analysis. Eligible patients were grouped by treatment: evolocumab add-on (evolocumab(+)) versus no evolocumab (evolocumab(-)). The primary outcome was plaque response (plaque regression >5%). Secondary outcomes included the percentage of changes in plaque burden and stenosis degree. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to estimate the association between evolocumab use and the above outcomes in both the general and subgroup (intensive versus nonintensive statin) analyses. RESULTS: Among 179 statin-treated patients (50 evolocumab(+), 129 evolocumab(-)), evolocumab add-on therapy was associated with higher plaque response (68.0% versus 34.1%), greater plaque burden reduction (median [interquartile range]: -8.2% [-11.4%, -1.8%] versus -1.9% [-6.7%, 4.4%]), and stenosis degree reduction (-15.3% [-33.7%, -1.3%] versus -5.4% [-25.8%, 12.3%]). Adjusted regression analyses showed significant associations between evolocumab use and plaque response (odds ratio [95% CI], 6.67 [2.80, 16.91]), plaque burden reduction (estimate [95% CI], -7.0% [-11.5%, -2.5%]), and stenosis degree reduction (estimate [95% CI], -20.3% [-31.7%, -7.0%]). Subgroup analyses according to background statin intensity showed consistent associations. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab add-on therapy over 6 months was associated with intracranial atherosclerotic plaque regression compared with statin therapy alone. However, given the retrospective design and potential between-group differences, these findings require further confirmation in prospective randomized controlled studies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。