Conclusion
SOX4 and P4HB seem to have diagnostic and prognostic value in PAC. While there was a direct correlation between SOX4 and P4HB, an inverse relationship between SOX4 and ERG was detected.
Methods
This retrospective study included fifty-six cases of PAC and an equal number of nodular prostatic hyperplasia (NPH) that were immunohistochemically stained by P4HB and SOX4. The
Objective
Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is the second most prevalent cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. Additionally, pathologists may face problems diagnosing it reliably and may need more than one marker. Thus, the search for new immunohistochemical biomarkers becomes mandatory. This study aims to investigate P4HB and SOX4 expression in prostatic carcinoma, their possible roles, and clinical significance.
Results
There was a highly significant difference between PAC and NPH regarding P4HB and SOX4 expressions in favor of PAC (both P<0.001). ROC curve analysis of the diagnostic power of P4HB showed 79% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.845, while SOX4 showed (89%, 100%, and 0.946, respectively). P4HB and SOX4 expression showed a direct correlation (P<0.001). Moreover, the H-score of SOX4 expression showed a significant inverse relation with ERG expression (P=0.047). There was a significant correlation between P4HB and SOX4 and Gleason score (P<0.001). Moreover, P4HB expression was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion (P=0.013), while SOX4 expression showed a significant association with perineural invasion (P=0.05).