Urban-Rural Differences in Self-Reported Physician-Diagnosed BPH and Associated Factors Among Older Men: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey

老年男性自我报告的医生诊断良性前列腺增生及其相关因素的城乡差异:一项全国性调查的横断面分析

阅读:2

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, yet its population-level assessment often depends on physician diagnosis, which may vary by healthcare access and reporting behavior. In China, substantial urban-rural differences in healthcare utilization raise questions about whether reported differences in BPH reflect true variation or diagnostic patterns. This study therefore examined urban-rural differences in self-reported physician-diagnosed BPH and associated factors using nationally representative data. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 8455 men aged 45 years and older using data from Wave 4 (2018) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). BPH status was defined based on self-reported physician diagnosis. Urban-rural differences in reported BPH were compared, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with reported BPH diagnosis. Of 8455 participants, the overall proportion reported a physician diagnosis of BPH was 11.9%, with subgroup-specific proportions of 18.4% in urban men and 10.1% in rural men. After adjustment for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-related variables, rural residence was associated with lower odds of reporting BPH (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.72). Several associations differed by residence, including a positive association between moderate physical activity and reported BPH in urban men, and inverse associations for longer sleep duration and regular alcohol consumption in rural men (P < .05). Urban men were more likely than rural men to report a physician diagnosis of BPH. Multiple sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were statistically associated with reported BPH, with some variation by residence. Given the cross-sectional design and self-reported measures, these findings reflect patterns of reporting and diagnosis rather than confirmed differences in underlying disease prevalence. Longitudinal studies using validated clinical assessments are needed to further clarify these relationships.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。