A personalized online intervention to enhance back pain-related self-efficacy: A two-arm randomized controlled trial (IDRIS)

一项旨在提高背痛患者自我效能感的个性化在线干预:一项双臂随机对照试验(IDRIS)

阅读:4

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low back pain (LBP) affects daily functioning and strains healthcare systems. Cognitive, behavioral, and emotional factors contribute to its persistence, yet these factors are often neglected in standard care. Personalized digital interventions containing psychoeducational information on relevant biopsychosocial aspects may thus improve outcomes when applied to patients in an early stage. This trial examined whether a brief, personalized animated psychoeducational video-tailored to individual risk profiles based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and covering biopsychosocial contributors to LBP (depression, catastrophizing, health anxiety, fear of movement, pain endurance behavior, expectations, trauma, emotion regulation)-improves pain-related self-efficacy in adults with acute and subacute low back pain (0-12 weeks). METHODS: In this two-arm randomized controlled trial, participants with back pain (duration <12 weeks) and resulting impairment were randomized to receive either a personalized animated video (intervention) or care as usual (control). Videos comprised modules (≈2-3.5 min per module) selected from eight possible topics based on baseline PROM cut-offs. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Primary analysis used mixed ANOVA to examine changes in pain-related self-efficacy (FESS) over time and between groups; secondary outcomes on biopsychosocial factors were tested with repeated measures ANOVAs and group-adjusted ANCOVAs. RESULTS: 75 participants were included in the analysis. Pain-related self-efficacy improved significantly over time, F(2, 148) = 6.435, p = .002, but without significant group differences, F(2, 148) = 2.146, p = .121. Most secondary outcomes also improved (all p < .001), except pain avoidance-endurance behavior, but analyses did not yield significant differences between intervention and control group (all p > .05. Participants rated the intervention as credible (M = 8.36), with moderate ratings for personal fit and symptom benefit. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Although brief exposure may have limited the impact, the intervention was well-received. Future research should explore integrating personalized psychoeducation into multimodal treatments, emphasizing the importance of individualized approaches for this diverse patient population. SUMMARY: A brief personalized online intervention improved back-pain self-efficacy, without being superior to an untreated control group. High acceptance seems promising for future multimodal use.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。