Effect Modification by Acute Coronary Syndrome Prevalence on Non-Invasive Ventilation Efficacy in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

急性冠脉综合征患病率对无创通气治疗急性心源性肺水肿疗效的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE). However, the 3CPO trial reported null results. Therefore, we hypothesized that the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) would influence the effectiveness of NIV. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NIV and standard oxygen therapy in patients with ACPE from PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase databases through December 2025. Random-effects meta-analysis and REML meta-regression were utilized, and evidence quality was evaluated using GRADE. (PROSPERO: CRD420251142245). Fourteen RCTs (n = 1967) were included in the analysis. NIV significantly reduced hospital mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.96; I(2) = 0%) and endotracheal intubation (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68). Meta-regression revealed that study-level ACS prevalence was significantly associated with the magnitude of NIV's mortality effect (β(1) = -0.023 per 1% increase in ACS, p = 0.008; R(2) = 46.2%). The equilibrium point occurred at an ACS prevalence of 14.1% (95% CI 5.2-23.0%). At 3CPO's ACS prevalence of 27%, the model predicted an RR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.58-0.97). The observed 3CPO RR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.66-1.43); the confidence intervals overlap substantially, and 3CPO was underpowered for mortality as an isolated endpoint. The mortality benefit of NIV appears to be associated with the prevalence of ACS among treated patients, though this ecological finding requires confirmation at the individual-patient level.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。