Abstract
Triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs) are found to be promising microarchitectures for bone substitutes owing to their low weight and superior mechanical characteristics. However, existing studies on their application are incomplete because they focus solely on biomechanical or in vitro aspects. Hardly any in vivo studies where different TPMS microarchitectures are compared have been reported. Therefore, we produced hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds with three types of TPMS microarchitectures, namely Diamond, Gyroid, and Primitive, and compared them with an established Lattice microarchitecture by mechanical testing, 3D-cell culture, and in vivo implantation. Common to all four microarchitectures was the minimal constriction of a sphere of 0.8 mm in diameter, which earlier was found superior in Lattice microarchitectures. Scanning by μCT revealed the precision and reproducibility of our printing method. The mechanical analysis showed significantly higher compression strength for Gyroid and Diamond samples compared with Primitive and Lattice. After in vitro culture with human bone marrow stromal cells in control or osteogenic medium, no differences between these microarchitectures were observed. However, from the TPMS microarchitectures, Diamond- and Gyroid-based scaffolds showed the highest bone ingrowth and bone-to-implant contact in vivo. Therefore, Diamond and Gyroid designs appear to be the most promising TPMS-type microarchitectures for scaffolds produced for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Impact Statement Extensive bone defects require the application of bone grafts. To match the existing requirements, scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS)-based microarchitectures could be used as bone substitutes. This work is dedicated to the investigation of mechanical and osteoconductive properties of TPMS-based scaffolds to determine the influencing factors on differences in their behavior and choose the most promising design to be used in bone tissue engineering.