Abstract
Achilles tendon injuries are commonly encountered in orthopaedic practice. The Achilles tendon is prone to rupture, and this negatively imparts ambulation. The diagnosis is clinical. Treatment options have evolved from conservative to surgeries, however there is no consensus on the most superior option of treatment. This narrative review aims to highlight the evolution in clinical diagnosis and treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures and discuss the current evidence in the treatment with emphasis on outcome measures of each treatment modality. Relevant studies on Achilles tendon ruptures with emphasis on treatment options, their strengths and weaknesses were reviewed. The treatment of Achilles tendon rupture has evolved from conservative options to surgeries. The surgical options include open repair, percutaneous repair, endoscopic repair, and ultrasound-guided repair. However, there is still no consensus on the most superior option for treating Achilles tendon injuries. Each method has its pros and cons. Conservative treatment has the appeal of the absence of scars, low cost and shorter duration of hospital stay. However, ankle stiffness, and late return to work are important drawbacks. Open surgery has the advantage of early return to function and low re-intervention rates. Surgical scars, likelihood of infection and cost are major disadvantages. Appropriate patient selection guided by the severity of the injury, the age of the patient, pre-injury status, work demand for the patient, experience of the surgeon, available resources, local soft tissue condition, and the patient's preferences are key to successful outcome.