Retrospective comparative study of early versus delayed electroacupuncture intervention on neurological functional recovery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury

回顾性比较早期与延迟电针干预对创伤性脊髓损伤患者神经功能恢复的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of early versus delayed electroacupuncture (EA) intervention on neurological recovery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), in order to clarify the optimal timing of EA and provide clinical evidence for targeted rehabilitation strategies. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including TSCI patients treated between March 2020 and April 2025. Based on the initiation time of EA, patients were divided into an early intervention group (EA within 2 weeks postinjury) and a delayed intervention group (EA > 2 weeks and ≤ 2 months postinjury). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment parameters, and pre- and posttreatment outcomes were collected. Neurological function was evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor and sensory scores and ASIA impairment scale (AIS) grade. Functional recovery was assessed by the functional independence measure (FIM) and modified Barthel Index (MBI), and pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 26.0, and P < .05 was considered significant. Ninety-two patients met the inclusion criteria (46 per group). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (P > .05). At 6 months, the early group showed a higher rate of AIS grade improvement (60.9% vs 37.0%, χ² = 5.126, P = .024) and a greater proportion achieving functional ambulation (AIS D-E: 65.2% vs 47.8%, χ² = 4.017, P = .045). Improvements in ASIA motor (19.3 ± 6.4 vs 14.2 ± 5.9, P = .001) and sensory scores (both P < .01) were significantly greater in the early group. Functional outcomes also favored early intervention, with higher gains in FIM (36.3 ± 8.1 vs 30.3 ± 7.9, P = .001) and MBI (37.2 ± 7.5 vs 32.2 ± 7.3, P = .001). Pain relief was more pronounced (VAS reduction: 3.6 ± 1.0 vs 2.7 ± 1.1, P < .001), and the overall complication rate was lower (21.7% vs 43.5%, P = .022). Early EA intervention significantly improves neurological and functional recovery, enhances pain relief, and reduces complications in TSCI patients. Compared with delayed treatment, early EA demonstrates superior efficacy and safety, supporting its early application in rehabilitation protocols.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。