Effects of tissue flossing and dynamic stretching on hamstring stiffness and flexibility in light volleyball enthusiasts: a randomized controlled trial

组织松紧带按摩和动态拉伸对轻度排球爱好者腘绳肌僵硬性和柔韧性的影响:一项随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the acute and sustained effects of tissue flossing (TF) versus dynamic stretching (DS) on hamstring muscle stiffness and flexibility in light volleyball (LVB) enthusiasts. METHODS: Thirty-seven participants were randomly assigned to TF, DS, or placebo groups. Muscle stiffness was evaluated using shear-wave elastography, measuring Young's modulus at the distal and proximal regions of the biceps femoris long head and semitendinosus. Flexibility was assessed via passive knee extension (KE), straight leg raise (SLR), and forward flexion distance (FFD) at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 30 min post-intervention. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that TF significantly reduced muscle stiffness compared to DS at the 30-min mark, particularly in the semitendinosus [distal: mean difference = -43.40 kPa, 95% CI (-80.65, -6.16), p = 0.007; proximal: -51.13 kPa, (-101.20, -1.05), p = 0.040]. However, no significant differences were observed between the TF and DS groups in flexibility outcomes (KE, SLR, or FFD) at any time point. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that while TF offers a prolonged reduction in hamstring stiffness-suggesting potential benefits in injury prevention and prolonged performance-its effect on functional flexibility remains comparable to that of dynamic stretching. TF may serve as an effective warm-up intervention for athletes requiring sustained decreases in muscle stiffness during activities.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。