Immediate Effects of Abdominal Hypopressive Technique Versus PNF Stretching in Shortened Hamstring Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

腹部低压疗法与本体感觉神经肌肉促进法(PNF)拉伸治疗腘绳肌短缩综合征的即时疗效比较:一项初步随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Short Hamstring Syndrome (SHS) is described as a deficit of extensibility of this musculature. In contrast to Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF), which is widely used in these cases, the abdominal hypopressive technique (AHT) is presented as a possible method to improve flexibility. The primary aim of this trial was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a single-session AHT program versus PNF stretching in adults with SHS, while the secondary, exploratory aim was to estimate their immediate effects on hamstring flexibility to inform the design and sample size of a future definitive trial. METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled trial of a single treatment session was designed, with a pre- and post-treatment evaluation to assess the effects of both techniques on flexibility. 19 subjects were randomized into an AHT group and a PNF stretching group. The Straight Leg Raise and Toe Touch tests assessed changes after treatment. Paired samples t-tests and independent samples t-tests were used to statistically analyze changes within and between groups, respectively. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in both groups on all tests pre- and post-intervention. However, no significant differences were found between the groups following the intervention. DISCUSSION: Both AHT and PNF techniques produced immediate improvements in hamstring flexibility in adults with shortened hamstring syndrome. However, these findings are exploratory, and, given the pilot nature of the trial, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the superiority of one method over the other.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。