Nociception level index as a tool of measuring pain objectively in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a feasibility study

伤害感受水平指数作为客观测量复杂区域疼痛综合征患者疼痛的工具:一项可行性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the feasibility of using the Nociception Level Index (NOL) as an objective tool for assessing pain in awake patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Traditional pain assessment methods, such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), are subjective and influenced by psychological and cognitive factors, limiting their accuracy in chronic pain conditions. METHODS: A single-center, prospective observational study was conducted with 26 CRPS patients. The NOL index, a multi-parameter device measuring autonomic nervous system responses, was assessed alongside VAS scores during physiotherapy exercises and intravenous lidocaine treatment. Pain levels were recorded at baseline, during painful exercises, and post-lidocaine administration. Changes in NOL and VAS scores were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with bootstrapped 95% confidence interval (CI) evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of NOL and VAS in discriminating painful from non-painful states. RESULTS: Physiotherapy exercises significantly increased both NOL (from 22.7 ± 10.7 to 30.3 ± 8.9) and VAS scores (from 5.5 ± 2.8 to 8.15 ± 1.6) (p < 0.001 for both). Lidocaine treatment led to partial pain relief, with VAS scores decreasing statistically significantly (from 7.5 ± 2.2 to 4.7 ± 2.8, p < 0.001), while NOL values trended lower (from 35.3 ± 12.2 to 29.4 ± 15.6, p = 0.26). ROC analysis showed comparable discrimination between painful and non-painful states for both tools [AUC: NOL 0.76 95% CI (0.68,0.84); VAS 0.78 95% CI (0.7,0.85)]. CONCLUSIONS: The NOL index shows promise as a complementary tool for objective pain assessment in CRPS, potentially offering insights into pain dynamics that subjective tools may miss. Further research with larger cohorts and standardized protocols is recommended to validate its clinical utility in chronic pain management.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。