Predictors of Cancer Genetic Testing Among U.S. Adults: Insights From the Health Information National Trends Survey 7

美国成年人癌症基因检测的预测因素:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的启示 7

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progress in molecular genomics has increased the accessibility, availability, and affordability of genetic testing to correctly identify individuals at elevated risk for hereditary cancers. Understanding the sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioural factors influencing genetic testing uptake is essential to addressing disparities and guiding targeted interventions. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of cancer genetic testing in U.S. adults, while correlating it with various predictors of clinical and behavioural aspects, using data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey 7 (HINTS 7). METHODS:  We analysed data from the HINTS 7, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey conducted in 2024. The analytic cohort included 514 adult respondents, corresponding to an estimated 20.7 million U.S. adults. Survey-weighted bivariate analyses were used to examine patterns of genetic testing. Additionally, multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for associations between predictors and the likelihood of undergoing cancer genetic testing using Stata 19 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX). RESULTS:  Overall, 23.4% of U.S. adults reported having undergone genetic testing. Compared to respondents aged 18-34, those aged 35-49 (aOR = 4.69, 95% CI: 1.90-11.56) and 50-64 (aOR = 6.60, 95% CI: 2.67-16.33) were significantly more likely to have been tested. Non-Hispanic Black adults (aOR = 5.55, 95% CI: 2.31-13.35) and individuals of "Other" racial/ethnic backgrounds (aOR = 4.37, 95% CI: 1.46-13.06) also had higher odds compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Participants with annual household incomes between $20,000 and $34,999 (aOR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.43-10.11) and those with a personal history of cancer (aOR = 4.32, 95% CI: 1.86-9.99) were more likely to have undergone testing. Notably, higher trust in healthcare providers was inversely associated with testing (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04-0.87), whereas use of health/wellness apps increased the odds (aOR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.05-4.26). CONCLUSIONS:  Age, race/ethnicity, income, personal cancer history, trust in healthcare providers, and engagement with digital health tools were significant predictors of cancer genetic testing. These findings underscore the need for targeted outreach and education, particularly among younger adults, certain racial/ethnic groups, and individuals with lower engagement in digital health, to ensure equitable access to genetic testing.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。