Challenges in recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing efficacy and toxicity between post-operative and definitive IMRT-based reirradiation

复发性头颈部鳞状细胞癌治疗的挑战:比较术后和根治性IMRT再照射的疗效和毒性的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment of patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer in a previously irradiated field remains challenging. We performed a meta-analysis, comparing the efficacy and safety of definitive and post-operative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based reirradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS and PsycINFO were systematically searched. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: 10 eligible studies with a median follow up of 24.9 months (9.6-78.1) and a total of 958 patients were identified, two of which are prospective trials. 455 were patients treated with post-operative/ adjuvant IMRT (aIMRT), while 503 patients received definitive IMRT (dIMRT). Median age was 62 years (48-63), 78 % were males and the rate of concomitant systemic therapy varied between 0 and 100 %.Post-operative IMRT showed significantly higher 1-year overall survival of 68 %, compared to 55 % for dIMRT, with a risk reduction (RR) of 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.76-0.93). aIMRT achieved superior 1-year locoregional control (65 %) in comparison to dIMRT (58 %) with an RR of 0.89 (95 % CI: 0.798 to 0.997). All other endpoints did not reach statistical significance. The certainty of our findings was low, due to limitations in the included studies. Radiotoxicity was insufficiently reported and does not allow any conclusions. CONCLUSION: Post-operative IMRT achieves superior survival and tumor control and should be the preferred option for patients eligible for surgery. Careful patient evaluation and selection are fundamental to maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing treatment-related toxicities.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。