Treatment approaches for non-metastatic small cell bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves

非转移性小细胞膀胱癌的治疗方法:Kaplan-Meier曲线重建的荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Small cell bladder cancer is an aggressive histological subtype and represents one of the most common extra-pulmonary small cell carcinomas. Treatment options include radical cystectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or combinations of these three. However, the optimal treatment approach remains unknown. This meta-analysis assesses the current literature on non-metastatic SCBC and analyzes different treatment approaches. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) utilizing the search terms "small or neuroendocrine AND cancer OR Carcinoma OR Tumor OR Malignan* OR oncolog* OR metastati* OR neoplasm AND bladder or urothelial or Urologic" from inception until March 2024. Eligible papers reported treatment and overall survival (OS) of non-metastatic SCBC patients. A meta-analysis was conducted comparing treatments with radical cystectomy- and radiotherapy-based approaches in addition to the use of chemotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 12 articles were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding the comparison between radical cystectomy-based treatment and radiotherapy-based treatment, comparable OS was observed between both groups as the reported hazard ratio (HR) was found to be 1.04 (95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 0.90, 1.20, p = 0.6). After including chemotherapy in the analysis, it was observed that using radical cystectomy or radiotherapy with the addition of chemotherapy showed better OS with lower HR (0.53 [95 %CI: 0.39, 0.73], p < 0.0001) compared with radical cystectomy or radiotherapy without chemotherapy. The median OS of radical cystectomy or radiotherapy with chemotherapy was higher than that of radical cystectomy or radiotherapy without chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone as follows: 30.89 (95 %CI: 23.82, 40.08), 19.67 (95 %CI: 16.26, 23.80), and 19.20 (95 %CI: 16.55, 22.28), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, no OS difference was observed in patients undergoing radical cystectomy-based or radiotherapy-based treatments. The addition of chemotherapy to local therapy seems to improve OS. However, given the high heterogeneity of the included studies, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。