Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with pulmonary metastasis (PM) has a poor prognosis, and optimal treatment strategies remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with advanced HCC with PM who were treated with resection of pulmonary metastases versus those treated with targeted therapies combined with immunotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of HCC patients with PM who underwent either pulmonary metastasectomy or immunotherapy combined with targeted therapies at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, Fujian Provincial Hospital, and West China Hospital of Sichuan University from September 2013 to October 2022. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control the influence of potential confounders, and the survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 119 HCC patients with PM were included in this study. The overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy was significantly longer than that of patients who received immunotherapy targeted combinations (OS: 1-year, 80.0% vs. 59.3%; 2-year, 31.7% vs. 20.3%; 3-year, 20.0% vs. 0; P < 0.001). After PSM, the long-term prognosis of the pulmonary metastasectomy group remained significantly better than that of the immunotherapy combination group (OS: 1-year, 87.0% vs. 69.6%; 2-year, 34.8% vs. 30.4%; 3-year, 21.7% vs. 0; P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment allocation (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.177, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.068-4.439) and hepatic tumor T stage (HR = 2.342, 95% CI = 1.209-4.538) were independent risk factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastasectomy was associated with improved survival compared to immunotherapy combined with targeted therapies and may represent an optimal treatment option for highly selected HCC patients with resectable PM.