The great live and move challenge and the promotion of physical activity in children: results from a two-school-year cluster-randomized trial

“活力生活与运动挑战”以及促进儿童身体活动:一项为期两个学年的整群随机试验的结果

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population surveys indicate that a large proportion of children worldwide do not meet the recommended 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) daily. This study aimed to assess the impact of the Great Live and Move Challenge (GLMC), a theory of planned behavior (TPB)-based intervention, on PA and TPB variables in French primary school children over two school years. Secondary objectives included assessing whether TPB variables mediated the GLMC's impact on PA and whether the GLMC impacted the strength of the link between TPB variables. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted over 16 months. One hundred primary schools were randomized into an intervention or control group. A total of 2723 children aged 7-11 years (mean age: 9.1; 49.7% boys) were included (n intervention = 1420, n control = 1303). The GLMC, based on TPB, comprised a motivational phase (targeting attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control) and a volitional phase (notably focusing on the intentions-PA link). The intervention involved teachers, parents, and community stakeholders. The primary outcome was the change in the proportion of children meeting PA guidelines after 16 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in mean daily PA and TPB variables. Assessments occurred at baseline, 4, 12, and 16 months. Data were analyzed using mixed models and path analyses. RESULTS: The "time × group" interaction indicated that, compared with the control group, the intervention group had a significantly higher proportion of children meeting international PA guidelines after 16 months (OR = 3.38, 95% CI = 2.50 to 4.56, P < 0.001). TPB variables did not significantly mediate the impact of the GLMC on mean daily PA at 16 months. The path coefficient between intentions and mean daily PA was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group at 4 (CR = 2.45; β = 0.22 vs. 0.13) and 16 months (CR = 2.87; β = 0.24 vs. 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The GLMC increased the proportion of children meeting PA guidelines over 16 months, and may help bridge the intentions-PA gap. The absence of mediation by TPB variables highlights the need to investigate other psychosocial mechanisms to better understand how the GLMC promotes PA in children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) Registry: 61,116,221 (retrospectively registered).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。