Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values in sentinel lymph nodes versus primary tumors for gastric cancer N staging

胃癌N分期中前哨淋巴结与原发肿瘤表观扩散系数值的比较

阅读:2

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values based on the primary tumor and sentinel lymph node (SLN) for predicting N stages of gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: One hundred and sixty histopathologically confirmed GC patients between April 2021 and October 2024 were prospectively recruited. Preoperative DW-MRI was performed, and ADC values from primary tumors (ADC(T)) and SLNs (ADC(LN)), along with their relative ratios (rADC(T), rADC(LN)), were measured. Differences in these parameters across N stages were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate their diagnostic performances for predicting N0 vs. N1-3 stages, N0 + 1 vs. N2 + 3 stages, and N0 + 1 + 2 vs. N3 stages. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in ADC(T), rADC(T), ADC(LN), and rADC(LN) values across N stages (all p < 0.001). The AUC values of ADC(T), rADC(T), ADC(LN), and rADC(LN) for predicting N0 vs. N1 + 2 + 3 stages were 0.753, 0.727, 0.782, 0.792, respectively. The AUC values of ADC(T), rADC(T), ADC(LN), and rADC(LN) for predicting N0 + 1 vs. N2 + 3 stages were 0.776, 0.767, 0.844, 0.837, respectively. The AUC values of ADC(T), rADC(T), ADC(LN), and rADC(LN) for predicting N0 + 1 + 2 vs. N3 stages were 0.797, 0.792, 0.857, 0.848, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both primary tumor- and SLN-derived ADC values can effectively differentiate N stages among patients with GC. SLN-based ADC parameters exhibit superior diagnostic performance compared to primary tumor-based measurements in stratifying N-stage progression.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。