Classical McIndoe Technique Versus the McIndoe Technique with a Neovaginal PACIENA Prosthesis(®) and No Skin Graft

传统 McIndoe 技术与使用新阴道 PACIENA 假体 (®) 且不进行皮肤移植的 McIndoe 技术对比

阅读:1

Abstract

An observational, retrospective study was completed to compare the results of the PACIENA clinical trial (using the modified McIndoe technique) with a historical control group of nine patients who were operated on at San Juan University Hospital (1992-2015) using the classic technique. The PACIENA clinical trial included seven patients with vaginal agenesis who were operated on at two reference sites (May 2017-May 2018) using a neovaginal polylactic acid (PLA) prosthesis (PACIENA(®) prosthesis) and avoiding the use of a skin graft. The results illustrate a reduction in the length of surgery, 86.43 ± 4.75 min in the group with no skin graft compared to 155.56 ± 28.44 in the control group (p < 0.05); and reduction in the length of hospitalization time. Differences were also registered in the length of the neovagina, the average being 8.93 ± 1.42 cm for cases and 6.56 ± 1.13 cm for controls, with no differences in neovaginal epithelialization times or in the satisfaction of sexual relations occurring between groups. The modification of the classical McIndoe technique using the neovaginal PACIENA(®) prosthesis appears to be successful, obtaining good clinical results with shorter surgery and hospitalization times.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。