Abstract
The main role of panoramic radiography lies in its rapid screening capability and its ability to detect and identify bone lesions, pathologies, and tooth-bearing structures. Since panoramic radiographs are widely used, they provide a good view of the jaw bones, maxillary sinus, and temporomandibular area. However, their major limitation is the reduced ability to accurately assess bone conditions, particularly in evaluating cortical integrity or identifying subtle, nondisplaced, or greenstick-type fracture lines. Other limitations include the presence of artifacts, image distortion, magnification variability, and high sensitivity to patient and film positioning, all of which can compromise image quality and diagnostic confidence. This 2D imaging method is still used worldwide, especially by dentists; however, this type of radiograph can be unpredictable due to structural superimposition and reduced ability to clearly establish, measure, and verify the precise dimensions, boundaries, and areas occupied by selected lesions. Many patients undergo panoramic imaging to assess possible mandibular fractures after trauma or following the removal of cysts, tumors, or impacted teeth. In most cases, the occurrence of a fracture without displacement can be misjudged, omitted, or underestimated. In such cases, either cone-beam computed tomography is performed or a detailed clinical examination before or during surgery, followed by intraoperative assessment, helps identify a possible fracture line, bone bending, mandibular instability, or the potential need for simultaneous prophylactic plating during dental procedures or the use of maxillomandibular fixation. This paper presents the author's own experience regarding the limitations of panoramic radiographs in estimating bone condition and detecting fracture lines. Therefore, it is essential to highlight the role of prophylactic (preventive) mandibular plating (PMP) or fixation and to clarify when it should be considered.