Abstract
AIM: To observe how Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent for legionellosis, can transmit through the hot water plumbing of residences and office buildings. METHOD AND RESULTS: Using qPCR, L. pneumophila and L. pneumophila Serogroup (Sg)1 were measured in hot water samples collected from 100 structures, consisting of 70 residences and 30 office buildings. The hot water samples collected from office buildings had a higher L. pneumophila detection frequency of 53% (16/30) than residences, with a 10(3) GU/L (median) concentration. An office building's age was not a statistically significant predictor of contamination, but its area (>100,000 sq. ft.) was, P = <0.001. Hot water samples collected at residences had a lower L. pneumophila detection frequency of 36% (25/70) than office buildings, with a 100 GU/L (median) concentration. A residence's age was a significant predictor of contamination, P = 0.009, but not its area. The water's secondary disinfectant type did not affect L. pneumophila detection frequency nor its concentration in residences, but the secondary disinfectant type did affect results in office buildings. Legionella pneumophila's highest detection frequencies were in samples collected in March-August for office buildings and in June-November for residences. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the built environment influences L. pneumophila transport and fate. Residential plumbing could be a potential "conduit" for L. pneumophila exposure from a source upstream of the hot water environment. Both old and newly built office buildings had an equal probability of L. pneumophila contamination. Legionella-related remediation efforts in office buildings (that contain commercial functions only) might not significantly improve a community's public health.