Abstract
BACKGROUND: The multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) is a widely used approach for handling missing data. However, its robustness, especially for high missing proportions in health indicators, is under-researched. The study aimed to provide a preliminary guideline for the choice of the extent of missing proportion to impute longitudinal health-related data using the MICE method. METHODS: The study obtained complete data on five mortality-related health indicators of 100 countries (2015-2019) from the Global Health Observatory. Nine incomplete datasets with missing rates from 10 to 90% were generated and imputed using MICE. The robustness of MICE was assessed through three approaches: comparison of means using the Repeated Measures- Analysis of variance, estimation of evaluation metrics (Root mean square error, mean absolute deviation, Bias, and proportionate variance), and visual inspection of box plots of imputed and non-imputed data. RESULTS: The Repeated Measures- Analysis of variance revealed significant differences between complete and imputed data, primarily in imputed data with over 50% missing proportions. Evaluation metrics exhibited 'high performance' for the dataset with a 50% missing proportion for various health indicators However, with missing proportions exceeding 70%, the majority of indicators demonstrated a 'low' performance level in terms of most evaluation metrics. The visual inspection of the box plot revealed severe variance shrinkage in imputed datasets with missing proportions beyond 70%, corroborating the findings from the evaluation metrics. CONCLUSION: It demonstrates high robustness up to 50% missing values, with marginal deviations from complete datasets. Caution is warranted for missing proportions between 50 and 70%, as moderate alterations are observed. Proportions beyond 70% lead to significant variance shrinkage and compromised data reliability, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging imputation limitations for practical decision-making.