Regional variation in ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations for people with type 2 diabetes in Germany: insights from a claims data analysis using the PopGrouper

德国2型糖尿病患者门诊可预防住院治疗的区域差异:基于PopGrouper的理赔数据分析的启示

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes-related hospitalizations and amputations serve as indicators of healthcare system performance, revealing regional disparities in diabetes management. This study examines regional variations in diabetes-related and all-cause outcomes among people with type 2 diabetes across Germany, adjusting for morbidity using the novel PopGrouper classification system. The paper aims to test the applicability of the PopGrouper for analyses of regional variations in health care. METHODS: Based on claims data from the BARMER sickness fund, six outcomes (hospitalizations, emergency hospitalizations, amputations, hospital care costs, inpatient days, and mortality) were analyzed. For each outcome, the ratio of observed to expected outcomes was calculated based on each region’s PopGroup composition and compared to results based on age-sex composition. Finally, the analysis identified top- and bottom-performing regions based on PopGroup-adjusted performance and explored patterns of resource utilization in these regions. RESULTS: The findings reveal the greatest regional variation for amputations and emergency hospitalizations, followed by hospitalizations, for both, age-sex-standardized and PopGroup-standardized ratios. The observed variation was slightly lower with PopGroup standardization than with age-sex standardization, except in the case of mortality. The top-performing regions had lower inpatient resource utilization, but higher outpatient resource utilization and participation in disease management programs in the year prior to the performance outcome measurement. CONCLUSION: Regional variations in hospitalizations and related outcomes for type 2 diabetes were observed. The PopGrouper enables straightforward risk-adjustment through indirect standardization and can make a significant contribution to controlling for morbidity-related care needs in regional comparative analyses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43999-025-00082-0.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。