Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Traditional Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale among adults with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: A cross-sectional study

台湾地区2型糖尿病成人传统中文电子健康素养量表的翻译及心理测量学评价:一项横断面研究

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The rise in online health information access has shifted health-seeking behaviors, yet a validated tool to assess eHealth literacy for the Taiwanese context remains unavailable. This study aimed to translate the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) into Traditional Chinese and validate its factor structure and reliability among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: The original 8-item eHEALS was translated into Traditional Chinese (eHEALS-TC) using forward and backward translation techniques, with input from four experts in pharmacy practice and educational psychology. A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the eHEALS-TC in adults with T2D who were taking diabetes medication. Participants were recruited from five community pharmacies in Taiwan between June 2023 and May 2024. The internal consistency of the eHEALS-TC was assessed using McDonald's omega (ω), while construct validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis. Criterion validity was determined by exploring the correlation between the mean total eHEALS-TC score and demographic factors, self-efficacy, health status, medication adherence, and A1C levels. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients participated in the study. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that all eHEALS-TC items were loaded onto a single factor, accounting for 84.95% of the total variance. The internal consistency reliability yielded a McDonald's ω of 0.974. The mean total eHEALS-TC score was positively associated with younger age (r = .382, P < .001), higher education attainment (r (s )= .525, P < .001), greater household income (r (s )= .359, P < .001), better self-reported health status (r (s )= .191, P = .002), stronger self-efficacy in medication use (r = .167, P = .006), and fewer barriers to medication-taking (r = .143, P = .018). However, no association was found between the mean total eHEALS-TC score and A1C levels (r = .048, P = .427). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide empirical evidence supporting the validity, reliability, and efficiency of the eHEALS-TC as a tool for assessing eHealth literacy among individuals with varying demographics and health conditions in Taiwan.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。