Abstract
The digitalization of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry has demonstrated the revolutionary potential of integrating blockchain technology with building information modelling (BIM). However, the selection of the most appropriate blockchain solution is a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, which is usually influenced by conflicting criteria and deep uncertainty. To overcome this, the present study proposes an extended Fermatean fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment (Extended FF-WASPAS) model. Unlike existing Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS (FF-WASPAS) methods, which are based on a single expert and may be biased, the proposed model incorporates the evaluations of multiple decision makers (DMKs) through a consensus-driven mechanism to ensure unbiased and accurate results. A case study is conducted to evaluate five leading blockchain platforms, Hyperledger Fabric, Polkadot, Tezos, Ethereum, and Algorand, under eight BIM-related criteria. The result indicates that Ethereum is the best blockchain platform to digitalize BIM compared to the other platforms because it is scalable, interoperable, secure, and has a wide range of applications in the real world. Sensitivity analysis over a wide range of parameter values, as well as DMKs assigned with different weight sets, confirmed the stability of the ranking. Furthermore, a quantitative comparative analysis with FF multiple criteria group decision-making (FF-MCGDM) and FF-WASPAS approaches, as well as a qualitative analysis with existing models in various fuzzy environments, confirms the robustness and reliability. Overall, the study provides a strong, interpretable, and consensus-based decision-support framework with high practical value for AEC stakeholders who wish to deploy secure, transparent, and efficient blockchain-enabled BIM solutions.